home >> blog >>
search (and destroy)
 

July 15, 2003

search (and destroy)

Yahoo! makes moves to acquire Overture, fueling it's growing search engine ambitions, while Google marches on and Microsoft is making "please-put-me-in-the-game-coach" faces on the sideline. Is there a search war a-brewing? And if so what will determine the victor? Read my extended entry for random musings on search engine competition and the next evolution of search engine technology: personalized search.

UPDATE (7/18): Here's a relevant Mercury News article with some more background: Search query returns reactions

Those of you who rank high on geekitude (if you need a metric, try the Geek Test - I scored 47.7%, making me an "Extreme Geek") already know that Yahoo!, still hot off its acquisition of Inktomi, is attempting to acquire Overture, who pioneered "pay-for-placement" search results and who earlier acquired AltaVista.

Strong currents are at work in the search engine world. While reigning champion and search engine super-hero Google continues it's strong march forward, Yahoo! is amassing it's own search engine super-powers. Meanwhile, in a dark cave in Redmond, Microsoft (or more precisely, the 50-member strong MSN search group) is gearing up to throw their hat into the ring. What does this mean? A showdown looms on the horizon.

But how would one hope to topple Google's page-ranking prowess? One avenue beyond leveraging the existing traffic and influence that Yahoo! and Microsoft (MSN) have would be to get the jump on the next technological advance in search technologies: personalized search.

When you enter a query at a search engine, it finds all the matching documents in the huge collections amassed by the engine's webcrawlers and then ranks them. What you see as a user are these results, presented in the order determined by this ranking. Part of Google's key to success was that its ranking mechanism, the now-famous PageRank algorithm (here's a research paper on it), exploits web hyperlink structure to identify authoritative pages on the web and rank them accordingly, creating results that you and I find much more relevant. Now imagine if such ranking mechanisms can be personalized for each and every user of the search engine. If the search engine has some knowledge of what your interests are (say, by reading in all your web bookmarks), it can tailor the result rankings to reflect those interests, resulting in search results that are that much more relevant to you.

One company has already tried this. Outride (formerly GroupFire) spun out of Xerox PARC (now PARC, Inc.) (actually, out of the very lab I work in!), with the goal of creating personalized search. Their technology was quite impressive, building off a number of PARC innovations, but they were in the right place at the wrong time. Sabotaged by the bursting dot-com bubble, and out in the market before search engine ranking performance reached the necessary threshold for robust, ubiquitous personalization, they failed to secure enough additional funding and had to shut their doors. As co-founder Jim Pitkow puts it, they were alternately "outridden" or "group-fired". Their assets (including all software and IP) were acquired by Google.

Fast forward to the present, where the clouds of search engine war may be starting to form. To achieve personalization, search engines will need to compute relevance rankings not once for the entire web (as currently done), but once per user for the entire web. Fortunately, students at Stanford's PageRank group have recently published papers on how to speed-up PageRank computation by using some clever linear algebra (remember Stanford has also birthed Google, and actually owns a fair chunk of them). Their resulting start-up company Kaltix (web page fairly bare, as they are in stealth mode) may indeed hold the key to making commercialized personalized web search a reality, which would make Kaltix the crown jewel in any search engine giant who may acquire them. Take your bets now.

And where am I in the midst of all this? Right in the middle it seems. The founder of Inktomi was my systems class professor, Outride was spun out of my own research group, multiple former Outride employees are now good friends of mine, and incidentally, one of the Kaltix founders is currently my housemate at my subletted summer residence. I'm excited to see what happens... I'll post more as things become fit for public consumption.

Posted by jheer at July 15, 2003 12:14 AM
Comments

Will be interesting to see if Kaltix will ever compete with Google, I doubt it, I think googles here to stay.

SEO

Posted by: SEO at August 15, 2003 02:30 PM

My company has patented and is also developing a search-engine personalization solution. I would like to get in touch with the appropriate individuals at Kaltix in hopes of exploring potential synergies and sharing market research. If anyone has a contact, please email me at jason.jerome@relevantmedia.net. Thank you.

Posted by: Jason Jerome at September 18, 2003 09:07 PM

Google announced the purchase of Kaltix today.

Posted by: mike at September 30, 2003 12:08 PM

My company hasn't patented anything but we would like to get in touch with Kaltix to beg alms for the poor.

Posted by: Wonk at September 30, 2003 01:50 PM

I need to speak with the boy's from Kaltix. I want to know how their company was structured before the sale to Google. Please have them contact me at earl@ultimateacquisitions.com A.S.A.P. it is in their best financial interest.

Posted by: Earl at September 30, 2003 07:12 PM

This next year (2004) should be an interesting one for Search Engines and those who make their livings relating to them. While Google has a HUGE lead in reliability and trust, MSN, AOL and YAHOO are not even close to out of the game. What I worry about is too many of the "second tier" engines and Directories "homoginizing" into a common front (back-end actually) where results are Indistinguishable from the other.

I would hate to be a Search Engine program manager right now. How do you distinguish your product from all others while APPEARING to provide the most accurate results.

In truth, "accurate" results are subjective, not objective.

It becomes akin to playing the stock market...you can maek money but there are no sure bets on either side of the fence.

Posted by: Search Engine Optimization at December 13, 2003 12:17 AM

The thought of Google getting their hands on the Kaltrix technology of being able to personalise an individuals search results is quite significant. The computation power required will no doubt be troublesome. But on the basis that Kaltrix have developed the tools I suspect the Search Engine Wars are about to take another major leap forward.

Posted by: Search engine optimisation at January 4, 2004 04:48 AM

At the end of November 2003 Google introduced a filter to filter out commercial sites driving them to paid listings. It will be interesting to see how the new and less relevant results that they now present will affect their ratings.

Posted by: Brian Jones at January 25, 2004 01:15 AM
Trackback Pings
Kaltix and personalized search
Excerpt: There are some interesting rumors floating around about Kaltix, a stealth start-up out of the Stanford WebBase Project. This is the same group that created the PageRank algorithm that was later spun out as a little start-up called Google. As you might ...
Weblog: DocBug
Tracked: August 13, 2003 11:31 PM
Google buys Kaltix for Personalized Search
Excerpt: First they buy Applied Semantics, now this. The Register reports Google just acquired Kaltix "a three-month-old, three-man Stanford startup that's working on personalized and context-sensitive search."
Weblog: Googler.Blogs.Com
Tracked: September 30, 2003 04:44 PM
Trackback URL


    jheer@acm.ørg